|
||||
![]() ![]() ![]()
![]()
|
|
Photo via IDS We hated--we mean Celine-Dion hated--the book, The Nanny Diaries. Saw the movie on a plane (which, granted, automatically makes things infinitely more watchable) and appreciated that the film at least had a better ending than the book...but it still kinda sucked. Never read The Devil Wears Prada, but enjoyed the movie (come on, Meryl Streep is a gimme). So did both our fellas. Lo's guy will even admit, in public, to really enjoying the movie The Jane Austin Book Club--and he's got chest hair! (In his defense, he watched that one on a plane, too...) In an age of Chick ____ (fill in the blank) as a marketing gimmick, the New York Times yesterday ran an interesting article on the future of a film genre which, as of late, has not been doing well ticket-wise: think The Holiday with Cameron Diaz and Kate Winslet; Catch and Release with Jennifer Garner; 27 Dresses with Katherine Heigl; Music & Lyrics with Drew Barrymore; P.S., I Love You with Hilary Swank. But did they bomb at the box office because people are tired of movies with more feminine themes, or because they were just crap movies? We're leaning toward the latter.. Maybe we're just fortunate to be surrounded by dudes who are so secure in their masculinity that they're psyched to watch When Harry Met Sally on USA while hungover on a Sunday, but by 2008, shouldn't we have all gotten to a place where men can enjoy stories about romance, women can dig action flicks (and porn) and no one's sexual or gender identity has to be mocked or questioned because of it? The Times article didn't think Knocked Up could be considered a chick flick, but why not? It's a movie about the ins and outs of pregnancy, for god's sake. Does the fact that it's got dudes smoking pot in it automatically disqualify it as such? Or is something deemed "chick lit" only if any straight male would rather have a facial than sit through it? We're torn between embracing the term "chick ____" and tossing it in the bin. On the one hand, what's so bad about female leads and feminine perspectives? And why shouldn't guys be interested in people who make up the majority of the population? A woman's touch is certainly important in fields that have previously been dominated by men: for example, the third annual Feminist Porn Awards were just held last weekend--certainly a good thing. On the other hand, we can see how the label marginalizes work (especially with an over-reliance on pink in title designs) that should otherwise just be judged on its artistic merit: Radar recently had a great article which re-envisioned some of the classics with new bubble-gum "chick-lit" covers. What do you think? 2 CommentsLeave a comment |
|
In one sense, revenge sex—when you sleep with your ex's nemesis, roommate, sibling, parent, or pet in order to pay them back for dumping you--totally works: how could your ex not be grossed out / horrified / disillusioned / damaged for life? But unless your ex is a few peas short of a casserole, your cunning plan is sure to backfire, because they'll know exactly why you slept with their paste-eating dork of a sibling, and the most overwhelming emotion they will feel is deep, abiding pity for you.
--From Buh Bye: The Ultimate Guide to Dumping and Getting Dumped
![]()
Send your queries to us at
emandlo@dailybedpost.com and drkate@dailybedpost.com. Want your sex dream analyzed by the Daily Bedpost dream expert? Email us at dreams@dailybedpost.com. Anonymity always honored! Check out Daily Bedpost on MySpace.com. |
i think when the term 'chick lit' or any other 'chick ___' is used, whatever it is referring to is belittled in a way because it becomes marginalized and almost seen as a joke instead of being taken seriously. i say nay to the term.
Bridget Jones Diary is a great movie. I'm a dude. If other dudes can't enjoy that movie then they're dumb. Maybe it helps if you have sisters.